|
While watching Einstein’s Big Idea, a recent PBS docudrama, Einstein said, "…I want to know the mind of God." The statement struck me in an odd way. I realized that E=mc2 may be only an approximation where the constant C, roughly 186,282 miles per second, is ultimately only a functional rule of thumb that bumps against the wall of a very specific limitation -- the physical plane. Physical plane limitations make the Pythagorian theorem,
a2 + b2 = c2, break down when one tries to use the formula at distances that begin to be affected by the curvature of the Earth. What I began to see as I watched with fascination the show unfold was that the speed of light is NOT the proper constant.
The proper constant is light itself.
Richard Hoagland’s (ex-science advisor to Walter Cronkite and author of the book Monument on Mars)
work on hyperdimensional physics theory probably more effectively encompasses a more accurate twist
that will eventually open the door to travel between the stars in time frames commensurate with the
human lifespan.
My new way of looking at Light and how to use it may give William Henry (a self-described investigative mythologist)
a profound bit of conceptual reasoning which might help him unravel the mystery of how the Stargate works.
Albert Einstein thought that the practical use of his E=mc2 formula would take a 100 years.
World War II and Lise Meitner did it in Einstein’s own lifetime. Is solving the riddle of the Stargate
the answer and is the solution to the Stargate a unique twist in how we see and understand light itself?
At first blush, I would have thought it would take another two thousand years (see my Yuga chart figure 3) to accomplish the annihilation of time for Homo sapiens, but perhaps not.
I may be to the creation of Earth’s first Stargate apparatus what Lisa Meitner was to the splitting of the atom.
If there are people out there with the mathematical skills and the practical engineering ability to develop
and construct a Stargate, it can be done; and I can provide the theoretical foundation to build upon.
Hopefully, this will be a private enterprise endeavor and the Federal government won’t disappear me or, worse
yet — Babelize us.
Now the whole earth had one language and few words. And as men migrated from the east, they found a plain in the land of Shinar and settled there. And they said to one another, 'Come, let us make bricks, and burn them thoroughly.' And they had brick for stone, and bitumen for mortar. Then they said, 'Come, let us build ourselves a city, and a tower with its top in the heavens, and let us make a name for ourselves, lest we be scattered abroad upon the face of the whole earth.' And the LORD came down to see the city and the tower, which the sons of men had built. And the LORD said, 'Behold, they are one people, and they have all one language; and this is only the beginning of what they will do; and nothing that they propose to do will now be impossible for them. Come, let us go down, and there confuse their language, that they may not understand one another's speech.' So the LORD scattered them abroad from there over the face of all the earth, and they left off building the city.' Therefore its name was called Babel, because there the LORD confused the language of all the earth; and from there the LORD scattered them abroad over the face of all the earth." (Genesis 11:1-9)
In Seeds of Heaven, I postulate an Intergalactic Federation. If you, the public, support my work,
the Seeds of Heaven ‘roman fleuve’ will explore the real story of the Tower of Babel
and why the IF decided to prevent Earthmen from building a stargate in 3450BC. What was different then?
What would make them take a different view to my Stargate in 2005AD? Or will they take a different view?
Will this article reach the internet? Will anyone understand it? Interesting questions.
I don’t have a clue as to the answer to them. We will just have to see, won’t we?
Was Carl Sagan smarter than me? Did he not want to go where angels fear to tread.
I am an Idiot (the Tarot Idiot – I mean) am about to step off the cliff. I refer you to Carl Sagan’s
Contact. What was built in that story? What did Carl Sagan
know and when did he know it? Why did he not attempt to build a Stargate? That story suggests he had some
idea of how to do it.
Back to why E=mc2 is probably only a very sophisticated approximation.
In the PBS docudrama “Einstein’s Big Idea”, Emily Du Chatelet announces to her salon, that she thought
there was a flaw in Isaac Newton’s Law of motion,
E=mv
Even Voltaire, probably history’s greatest iconoclast — unless you want to measure the Monty Python
crew against Voltaire’s standard — was shocked that she, a mere woman, would dare challenge the
pronouncements of the greatest thinker of the time. She offended Voltaire by siding with the ideas of
Gottfried Leipniz, who ascribed some kind of spiritual quality to motion that gave it special properties.
Thus, a formula more like
E=mv2
was likely the true measure of energy. Du Chatelet created an experiment in which Leipniz’s formula is
demonstrated to be exactly right. Well, not exactly right, but closer. What the experiment DID demonstrate
was that Isaac Newton’s formula was wrong for sure. When she told her friends she would publish her findings,
they all suggested caution, Isaac Newton’s words were pronouncements of god and not to be trifled with… She published anyway.
It would take 100 year for Albert Einstein to use that formula and add a unique twist to it and create
E=mc2
Voltaire and Du Chatelet had a real donnybrook over her siding with Leipniz over Newton.
I don’t know if the conversation in the docudrama actually occurred but it is instructive as written,
for a very special reason:
|
Voltaire: (paraphrased) Why ascribe to an object a
vague and immeasurable force like vis viva
it is a return to the old ways. It tis the occult!
Du Chatelet: When movement commences you said
tis true that a force is produced which
did not exist until now. Think of our
bodies… you have free will… you must
have free will to initiate motion. So all
Leibnitz is asking is where does this
force come from…
Voltaire: In your case I am sure the force is primeval
(this is a cutting stab at Du Chatelet’s
reported promiscuity).
Du Chatelet (now Du Chatelet makes the most profound statement I ever heard. It penetrates the soul of Voltaire and exposes his petty underbelly.):
You’re infuriating. You hide behind wit and
sarcasm. You only think you understand
Newton. You are incapable of understanding
Leipniz. You are a provocateur. Everything
you do is about something else….you invent
nothing!
|
In Du Chatelet’s statement I saw how the rationalists went down a wrong road, the road that leads to
atheism and the throwing out of the baby with the bath water. Votaire and his movement attacked The Church,
occultism, and mysticism instead of exposing and attacking the individual human entities who claimed to
represent these things.
Of course, the Church leadership was a collection of Rulers of Evil (it still is – see Los Angeles Files Recount Decades of Priests’ Abuse – New York Times October 11, 2005 By John M. Broder.).
Those Rulers of Evil were and are corrupt, lecherous (Lucretia Borgia was the illegitimate daughter of
Pope Alexander IV – so much for celibacy) and murderous. They took the Holy Bible away from the people, perpetrated genocide against the Cathars,
Merovigians, triggered the Hitlerian-like Inquisitions, and stood by while Hitler exterminated millions of
Jews and other so called inferior human beings. But these were men. These were Rulers of Evil. This was
not what The Church (or religion, the occult, mysticism) is supposed to have hidden deep in its bowels, which is Truth.
What is deep in the bowels of the occult and metaphysical view of the universe is a much bigger picture
than is contemplated by modern physics.
“Now the whole earth had one language and few words...And the LORD came down to see the city and the tower,
which the sons of men had built. And the LORD said, ‘Behold, they are one people, and they have all one
language; and this is only the beginning of what they will do; and nothing that they propose to do will
now be impossible for them." (Genesis 11:1-9)
The reason the bigger picture is not visible is because something is missing in the E=mc2 equation.
All of modern physics has taken a wrong turn in the road by discovering or is it imagining all these
smaller and smaller particles. That my friends is a bottomless pit. You will never arrive at a place
where you will discover an object that is not divisible.
If you want to befuddle a religious fanatic true believer, just suck them into a discussion of how this
and that thing got created. It will always be God created it. Keep leading them and get them to thinking,
‘Oh man, I’ve got a convert.’ Then when you have them where you want them ask, ‘And who created God?’
The modern physicist is like a true believer. They are spending all these billions of taxpayer dollars
building all these umteenotrons that cover massive amounts of acreage chasing an illusion. Yes, I said an
illusion. Hell, the dumbest yogi sitting in lotus in the Himalayas figured that one out eons ago.
String Theory is the latest addition to the mainstream theoretical physics universe. This theory
comes closer to the true nature of the cosmos than anything heretofore presented. The scientific community,
which worships at the altar of the provability of ideas, mostly through arcane mathematical analysis that
gets peer reviewed and accepted or rejected based on the reputations of the most respected in the fields of
which they are associated.
The crowning achievement of any theory that begins as a mathematical description is its predictability,
when it correctly defines newly observed phenomena. Such is the case with Einstein’s E=mc2.
Lise Meitner and Otto Hahn were trying to create a humongous nucleus by bombarding it with protons, not to split the atom.
What happened is Meitner (not Otto Hahn) realized that the results they were getting indicated the atom
was splitting as it got too big. When the atom split, it released energy. At the time they
could not account for what was supplying the energy. When Meitner calculated how much energy was released
the amount was shown to be equal to E=mc2 To the chagrin of the people of Hiroshima and Nagasaki,
the rest is history.
The twist I am going to put on the E=mc2 equation is going to solve and/or point to how to
create a stargate, annihilate time for Homo sapiens, and give us the ability to go to the stars in a
matter of days not centuries. I am not sure how long it will take to go from our Solar system to
shake hands with Betty and Barney Hill’s Pleiadians. I prefer to go to Arcturus, since that is where Seeds of Heaven
places the Headquarters of the Intergalactic Federation. Saganites may prefer Vega. Whatever!
Let just build the damn thing and go someplace.
What is the sound of one hand clapping?
Einstein’s letters indicate that from a very young age he was obsessed with the nature of light.
When I heard that it told me Einstein was a master being. not an avatar like Ramakrishna, but certainly an
initiate of some altitude. But, that has to be explored in another article.
Frank Lloyd Wright in a throw-away line in his autobiography states that everything is probably made of
light.
Biographers say Einstein asked this question: What would I see if I rode on a beam of light?
In that statement lay the flaw in Einstein’s fundamental thinking about light. Light is not a beam.
Einstein also thought of light as a wave upon which he could surf. Light is not a wave.
"I think the gods are laughing at me," Einstein was heard to say.
James Clerk Maxwell was probably closest to the best conceptualization of light. Maxwell’s equations
apparently captured the truth but he couldn’t conceptualize what the equations were telling him. Maxwell
apparently hadn’t read Buddhist material or had access to Yogic thinking. The best he could come up with
was that the equations were saying you can’t catch up to light. It will always squiggle away from you.
But, what does this mean in practical terms?
What is the sound of one hand clapping?
Einstein seems to have posed this question: What would happen if I held a mirror up to my face and
traveled at the speed of light toward the mirror. Would I be invisible?
What is the sound of one hand clapping?
Here is the question I now pose to the readers of this tract.
If light is not a beam. If light is not a wave. Then what is light?
E=mc2 says energy equals mass times ‘the speed of light’ squared. The irrefutable consensus is that the speed of light
is 186,282 miles per second. The world of physics says that this is a constant. Nothing can go faster than
the speed of light. It is the cosmic speed limit. I wonder what the cosmic fine is for exceeding that
speed limit. Is the Intergalactic Federation imposing that fine on the Pleiadians? Clearly they are
exceeding it by leaps and bounds. Or…. hummmmm maybe they are not exceeding the speed of light because
they are not using primitive propulsion systems like us Homo sapiens are so proud to have developed and
think is the cat’s meow. I was once told not to try to pat myself on the back because I might break my arm.
End of Part 1
So to avoid me patting myself on the back I will let you the thinking public do so or not… whichever you prefer:
What are your thoughts on this subject? The author is interested in hearing them and including
any germane responses here. If you have feedback, please write .
All significant inputs will be published on this site below.
| 
